World War 3 – Bomb shelters in the UK MAPPED amid conflict fears

WORLD WAR 3 fears are gripping the world at the moment, with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un squaring up to American President Donald Trump.


underground bomb

World War 3 – Bomb shelters in the UK mapped amid fears of another conflict

There are eight deep level shelters in the UK, and all of them are in London, far down underneath Underground stations. This is unlike nuclear shelters, which are dotted across the UK.

The eight are at Chancery Lane, Belsize Park, Camden Town, Goodge Street, Clapham North, Clapham Common, Clapham South and Stockwell.

Built during World War II, two more were planned at St. Paul’s and Oval, but these were not completed. The buildings above St.Paul’s were not considered stable enough, and difficult ground conditions at Oval stopped building work there.

Each shelter consists of a pair of parallel tunnels 5.05m in diameter and 370m long.

The shelters were started in 1940 during the Blitz, in response to public demand to be able to shelter in London Underground stations

Each tunnel is divided into two decks, and each shelter was designed to hold up to 10,000 people – although the completed shelters actually hold 8,000.

The shelters were started in 1940 during the Blitz, in response to public demand to be able to shelter in London Underground stations.

They were not completed until 1942, once the Blitz was over. Initially they were used by the government, but as bombing intensified five were opened to the public in 1944: Stockwell, Clapham North, Camden Town, Belsize Park and Clapham South.

The Goodge Street shelter was used by General Eisenhower, and the Chancery Lane shelter was used as a communications centre.


World War 3 – Deep level shelters can be found at eight locations around London

After World War II, the shelters each took on a number of different uses. Goodge street shelter continued to be used by the army until a fire in 1956, after which the government decided the shelters were not suitable for use by large numbers of the public or military.

The Chancery Lane shelter was covering into a telephone exchange as well as being expanded to serve as a government shelter during the Cold War.

Clapham South is home to the deepest of all the tunnels, and was famously used to house the first 200 immigrants from the Caribbean who arrived on the MV Empire Windrush.

They slept there for four weeks until they found their own accommodation, with many settling in nearby Brixton.

The golf hole on top of Donald Trump’ssecret bomb shelter

Play Video

clapham southGetty Images

World War 3 – Clapham South is one of the locations housing a deep level bomb shelter

In 1951 it became the Festival Hotel, providing cheap board for visitors to the Festival of Britain, but was closed after the fire at Goodge Street shelter in 1956.

Clapham South is now a Grade II listed building with pre-booked tours arranged by the London Transport Museum.

The Clapham North shelter was purchased in 2014 by the Zero Carbon Food company, who now use the shelter as a hydroponic farm to grow salad.

All other shelters were sold by the government to Transport for London in the 1990s, leasing several out for archival storage.



I personally think lbj is overrated and shouldn’t not be considered the best player ever here are a few reason”s why….

  1.  The first reason is the eastern conference isnt that great there are no real superstars on the east with the exception of players like carmelo anothony, derick rose dewight howard, yes he went to 6 stright finals cause he pretty much had a free ride
  2. The second reason is the decision to leave Cleveland, he couldn’t get it done with the average players he had around him, knowing he would never get a ring if he stayed so he goes on national t.v the 1st player to have his own special just to say he is taking his talents to south beach letting everyone from his home town down
  3.  Third reason is if he never joined forces with bosh and wade he would still be ringless even tho his first year with the hear he couldn’t get things done losing to a average dallas team in the finals,  he cried to the owner so they went out and got more fire power by signing old superstars for less money then he finally got his 1st ring,  the following year he should of lost in the finals to the spurs in game 6 but got lucky with Ray allen hitting a last minuite 3 point shot sending it going on to win the championship in a game 7 collecting his 2nd ring…. I personally think Ray allen saved his legacy….. 
  4.  The fourth reason he is not the greatest us his decision to return to the cavs after winning 2 rings…. If he never won them with the hear he would of never went back he saw a opportunity to have another chance cause of kyrie irving and Kevin love 2 more super stars he could join to win his 3rd ring which again he got lucky in the finals cause golden state got comfortable being up 3-1 in the series taking there foot off the gas letting the cavs come back and win giving lbj his 3rd ring , finally living up to his promise of bring a championship home to Cleveland…
  5.  Finally for those reasons I dont think he could even be compared to jordan lbj is a poor sport always crying to the refs and blaming other people he put every american down saying go back to your normal job after losing with the heat jordan would of never said that….. Also jordan never team hopped trying to get easy rings he never lost in the finals, he never let a series go into a game 6 , he made every player around him better he won 6 rings in the east when the nba was filled with stars and hall of famers…. So to me he is the greatest lbj prob isnt in the top 5…. I would compare him to kobe braynt before you start talking about mj and for those reasons he could never be considered the best because of his past…….


Story highlights
Trump’s 100th day in office falls on Saturday
He’s had trouble moving on some of his agenda items President Donald Trump is all about the bark — bold, aggressive promises.

Whether it’s unfair Chinese trade practices, the North American Free Trade Agreement he’s dubbed a “disaster” or Iran’s destabilizing actions, Trump has kept up much of his bold campaign rhetoric.

But when it comes to follow through, at least in his first 100 days in office Trump has come up short on the bite, failing to deliver on his toughest campaign promises.

After months of railing against NAFTA, some of Trump’s top aides signaled Wednesday he might withdraw from the deal altogether in the coming days.

By Wednesday night, Trump had talked to the fretful leaders of Canada and Mexico and stood down on the possibility, deciding against pulling the US from the trade deal altogether.

“I received calls from the President of Mexico and the Prime Minister of Canada asking to renegotiate NAFTA rather than terminate,” Trump tweeted Thursday morning. “I agreed subject to the fact that if we do not reach a fair deal for all, we will then terminate NAFTA.”

But Trump’s decision to swerve away from NAFTA withdrawal also signaled the extent to which Trump is running up against the realities of governing as he attempts to implement his bold campaign promises.

As Trump’s senior staff in recent days mulled a potential executive order announcing the US’ plans to withdraw from NAFTA, officials have had to consider tedious factors to ensure that they would maintain fast-track authority over a renegotiated deal and drafted several versions of a potential order to ensure it would pass muster. It’s part of the reason the White House has yet to formally notify Congress of its plans to renegotiate the deal.

Trump’s decision not to withdraw from NAFTA came only after Trump consulted with members of his Cabinet as well as business and congressional leaders, a senior White House official said Thursday.


The realities of governing have hit Trump harder than most presidents.

Not only is Trump the first president to have never served in government or the military, but he surged to the White House on far-flung campaign promises that even many in his own party dismissed as unrealistic.

And the business of making those promises a reality, coupled with his lack of relevant Washington experience, has left Trump with few choices beyond sticking to his rhetorical guns while scrambling behind the scenes to find ways to convert those bold ideas into sound policy.

Trump has continued to rail against Iran, decrying the nuclear deal brokered under the previous administration as one of the “worst deals” just as he did during the campaign and arguing most recently that Iran was “not living up to the spirit of the agreement.”

But even though the Trump administration put Iran “on notice” in the first weeks of Trump’s presidency, there’s been little follow-through.

Absent any evidence to the contrary, the State Department was forced to affirm last week that Iran is abiding by the terms of the nuclear deal. The Trump administration has shown no signs so far of any plans to renegotiate the deal as the Republican nominee pledged during the campaign.

And while he has continued to decry the US trade deficit with China and recently tied widespread loss of manufacturing jobs to the Asian powerhouse, Trump has confronted the reality of the US’s complicated and delicate relationship with China in the last month as he’s sought to enlist China in efforts to tame an increasingly belligerent North Korea.

“Why would I call China a currency manipulator when they are working with us on the North Korean problem?” Trump tweeted earlier this month as he took flak for reneging on a major campaign promise.

And beyond the diplomatic implications, Trump has also had to confront the reality that China long ago stopped artificially devaluing its currency — instead working to prop it up, which benefits US exports.

Bruising start

But Trump and his White House did not come to learn the limitations of his presidency and the realities of governing until after the bruising first weeks of his presidency.

White House officials’ meticulous review of the language of a potential executive order on NAFTA followed the administration’s early stumbles as it eagerly sought to implement another one of the Trump’s biggest campaign promises: banning travel from Muslim-majority, “terrorist-prone” countries.

The initial salvo on that ban came within days of Trump’s inauguration and with little consultation with government agencies that would typically be consulted. The result was chaos at airports worldwide and the detention of Muslims at US airports who had valid visas and even green cards to travel to and stay in the US.

Trump has also struggled to make good on his core campaign promise of repealing and replacing Obamacare with something “much better” amid disagreements between warring factions of the Republican Party. And amid his quest to get a bill passed as soon as possible, Trump failed to help bridge those differences and was forced to accept a loss, canceling a scheduled vote on the House floor.

Trump has sought to sidestep his difficulties on the legislative front with a slew of executive orders, but a person close to the White House acknowledged Wednesday that they were no substitute for legislation.

“They let you take action,” the person said of the orders. “It doesn’t take place of something statutory.”

Fight continues

But even as Trump is learning the lessons of governing and confronting the headwinds — diplomatic, economic and political — he faces as he tries to implement his hard-charging agenda, he is showing no signs of letting up.

A person close to Trump vowed Trump will only ramp up his actions on trade — still searching to make good in bold fashion on Trump’s campaign rhetoric.

“NAFTA as we know it today will change. It just is,” the person close to the White House and Trump said. “It’s just not going to stay the way it is. It’s going to be different.”

Trump displayed the same bravado on NAFTA Thursday morning as he did on the campaign trail, despite backing down on a potential NAFTA withdrawal just the night before.

“NAFTA has been a horrible deal for the United States. It’s been very good for Canada, it’s been very good for Mexico, but it’s been horrible for the United States,” Trump said Thursday from the Oval Office, as if he were still rallying supporters on the campaign trail


during the small sample that is the first round (limited to one entry per team), we looked at the 250 two-man lineups that have logged the most minutes during the 2017 playoffs. Each of the 250 were ranked in two different categories: net rating and the tandem’s cumulative score in NBA Math’s total points added (TPA). The ranks were then summed, and the top scores earned featured spots, so long as they’d logged at least 60 minutes.

This methodology ensures that we’re only looking at pairings that have spent significant time together, and confounding factors such as logging major minutes next to high-quality teammates are partially negated by the TPA aspect of the rankings, which rewards individual prowess.

Get the best sports content from the web and social in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

Honorable Mentions
1 OF 11

Gary Dineen/Getty Images
Because each postseason team can only have one two-man lineup featured in the actual rankings, six playoff squads are left out. Below, you can see the one-two punch that scored best for each:

Al-Farouq Aminu and Evan Turner, Portland Trail Blazers

Minutes: 64

Net Rating: minus-8.4 (No. 200)

Total TPA: 2.29 (No. 153)

Surprised this isn’t Damian Lillard and CJ McCollum? Well, the Golden State Warriors did everything in their power to eviscerate the Portland Trail Blazers’ starting lineup and successfully swept them out of the postseason, leaving the backcourt with a minus-28.3 net rating—No. 245 of the 250 most-used two-man lineups.

No Portland duos fared well against the Golden State juggernaut, but Al-Farouq Aminu and Evan Turner finishing at or close to average in NBA Math’s total points added (TPA) was enough to at least partially salvage their time together.

Paul George and Thaddeus Young, Indiana Pacers

Minutes: 130

Net Rating: minus-8.0 (No. 198)

Total TPA: 27.39 (No. 45)

Though the Indiana Pacers often kept games close against the Cleveland Cavaliers, they were also eliminated in just four games. That makes it tough for any combination of players to thrive, and thus we turn to the team’s two most successful figures.

Paul George and Thaddeus Young were still outscored by eight points per 100 possessions while sharing the floor, but they were also—by far—the team’s two best and most consistent players. Jeff Teague, Glenn Robinson III, Lance Stephenson and Aaron Brooks also finished with positive TPA scores, but they did so while playing smaller roles and/or working in less advantageous groupings.

Al Horford and Isaiah Thomas, Boston Celtics

Minutes: 123

Net Rating: 5.2 (No. 93)

Total TPA: 17.39 (No. 76)

Whether due to struggles that come with the territory for diminutive point guards in the playoffs or mental lapses while dealing with the tragic loss of his sister in a car accident, Isaiah Thomas struggled at the beginning of the Boston Celtics’ first-round series with the Chicago Bulls.

Fortunately, he’s started to turn on the jets as the matchup progresses, putting together stronger offensive performances and joining Al Horford as one of the team’s few game-changing players thus far. Don’t be surprised when this duo continues to climb up the rankings and fully overcomes the slow start.

Otto Porter Jr. and John Wall, Washington Wizards

Minutes: 105

Net Rating: 8.5 (No. 66)

Total TPA: 15.25 (No. 83)

Otto Porter Jr. and Bradley Beal spent the 2016-17 campaign battling to be John Wall’s beta dog, and it’s the former who has held his own better against the Atlanta Hawks.

Both are struggling to find their shots, but Porter’s defense has allowed him to move just beyond his 2-guard teammate and join the floor general as part of the team’s leading duo.

Paul Millsap and Taurean Prince, Atlanta Hawks

Minutes: 104

Net Rating: 6.0 (No. 87)

Total TPA: 21.52 (No. 61)

Through four games, the playoffs have served as a nice proving ground for Taurean Prince. The rookie forward has thrived against the Washington Wizards, averaging an impressive 13.3 points, 5.3 rebounds, 0.5 assists and 0.3 steals while shooting 63.9 percent from the field, 50.0 percent from downtown and a perfect 3-of-3 at the stripe.

When he shares the court with Paul Millsap, who continues to serve as the Atlanta Hawks’ best player, the Wizards can’t keep up. So despite Dennis Schroder’s offensive explosions and Dwight Howard’s prowess on the glass, it’s that duo that earns top marks in the first-round battle.

DeMar DeRozan and Norman Powell, Toronto Raptors

Minutes: 68

Net Rating: 18.8 (No. 27)

Total TPA: 12.2 (No. 100)

The elephant in the room is obvious: Why aren’t Kyle Lowry and DeMar DeRozan featured here?

Even though they remain the Toronto Raptors’ two best players, the team has outscored the Milwaukee Bucks by a meager 1.8 points per 100 possessions while they’re both on the floor. Norman Powell has unexpectedly functioned as the Raptors’ most efficient offensive contributor, as well as an effective perimeter defender, and that’s pushed him and DeRozan well ahead of the starting backcourt.
10. Giannis Antetokounmpo and Thon Maker, Milwaukee Bucks
2 OF 11

Mike McGinnis/Getty Images
Minutes: 99

Net Rating: 5.6 (No. 89)

Total TPA: 31.09 (No. 34)

The versatility of this duo is staggering.

Giannis Antetokounmpo can obviously do everything on the basketball court (except shoot threes accurately) after a regular season in which he became the first player in league history to finish top 20 league-wide in points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks. But this isn’t just about him, because Thon Maker has been a revelation during his initial postseason experience.

The rookie big man has looked the part of a future—and, oftentimes, present—stud, averaging 6.6 points, 3.4 rebounds, 2.0 assists, 1.0 steals and 1.2 blocks while shooting 42.9 percent from the field, 22.2 percent from downtown and 77.8 percent from the stripe. Those numbers won’t blow you away, and his points aren’t even coming in efficient fashion. But his across-the-board contributions and ability to work on the interior or the perimeter have confounded the Toronto Raptors defense.

Has Maker been the Milwaukee Bucks’ second-best player? That honor probably goes to Greg Monroe, who’s displaying some fantastic individual efforts during his inaugural playoff campaign. But Maker’s skill set is a better complement to Antetokounmpo, given his ability to exert a substantial gravitational pull.

Whereas Monroe and the All-Star small forward are posting a minus-0.1 net rating while they share the floor, Maker and Antetokounmpo are outscoring the favored Raptors by 5.6 points per 100 possessions. No pairing featuring No. 34 has been more effective while playing more than 60 minutes.
9. LeBron James and Tristan Thompson, Cleveland Cavaliers
3 OF 11

David Liam Kyle/Getty Images
Minutes: 116

Net Rating: 6.1 (No. 85)

Total TPA: 35.79 (No. 23)

The idea that the Cleveland Cavaliers featured a true one-two punch during the first-round sweep of the Indiana Pacers is laughable.

Kevin Love’s struggles inside the arc and turnover issues kept him from putting up celestial numbers, while Kyrie Irving managed to cancel out many of his high-scoring efforts by struggling immensely with his shot (41.9 percent from the field and 21.9 percent from three-point range), recording nearly as many turnovers as assists and playing porous defense. According to NBA Math’s TPA, both members of the Big Three finished with below-average scores after the Pacers elimination.

Still, they found success alongside LeBron James, who put together yet another otherworldly set of postseason performances while almost singlehandedly willing his team through the first round. James and Love posted a 6.9 net rating, and that number dropped to 3.3 with Irving and the leading superstar—still a positive, but by no means a standout figure.

James logged more than 60 minutes alongside those two, as well as J.R. Smith (7.2 net rating) and Tristan Thompson (6.1), but it’s the springy big man who gets the nod as his leading partner in crime. Thanks to his offensive rebounding exploits, efficiency around the hoop and status as one of the few defensive plusses during the first-round win, Thompson was one of the only Cleveland players whose first four games could be, in total, viewed as a success.

Deron Williams and Channing Frye join him and James in that category, but neither logged enough minutes alongside the four-time MVP to draw consideration here.
8. Mike Conley and Marc Gasol, Memphis Grizzlies
4 OF 11

Andy Lyons/Getty Images
Minutes: 113

Net Rating: 6.1 (No. 85)

Total TPA: 36.69 (No. 20)

Small sample sizes can be fun. They often produce wonky results, especially when rotations are solidifying and adjusting to the changing nature of the playoffs during the opening round.

As a result, the Memphis Grizzlies are the rare team for which the two best players actually comprise the leading one-two punch. Mike Conley and Marc Gasol have stood head and shoulders above the rest of their teammates through four games, despite valiant efforts from James Ennis and Andrew Harrison on the defensive end.

Conley has served as the offensive spark, averaging 24.0 points, 4.0 rebounds and 7.8 assists while shooting 48.5 percent from the field, 48.0 percent from downtown and 81.8 percent on his freebies. And the Game 4 winner in overtime notwithstanding, Gasol has managed to overcome some offensive struggles by anchoring a fearsome defense that has pestered every member of the San Antonio Spurs whose name doesn’t rhyme with Lawhi Keonard.

Thriving against Gregg Popovich’s crew during the postseason is no easy feat, which is why only two Memphis duos have logged more than 60 minutes and outscored the Spurs in the process: the featured pairing, and the Gasol-Wayne Selden unit.

But in terms of sheer individual ability, Selden can’t come close to Conley.
7. Joe Ingles and Joe Johnson, Utah Jazz
5 OF 11

Melissa Majchrzak/Getty Images
Minutes: 79

Net Rating: 11.6 (No. 47)

Total TPA: 23.69 (No. 55)

“He’s learned to use fakes, ball fakes, pass fakes, shot fakes,” Utah Jazz head coach Quinn Snyder said about Joe Ingles after the Australian small forward recorded a career-high 11 assists in a Game 4 victory over the Los Angeles Clippers, per Kyle Goon of the Salt Lake Tribune.

“And with his size, he’s still able to see. He’s able to throw a lob. He threw a bunch of really nice pocket passes to Fav [Derrick Favors] tonight on that little half roll. I like to say he’s got his eyes out. He’s worked at that.”

With Rudy Gobert getting healthy after suffering a leg injury 17 seconds into his playoff debut and Gordon Hayward struggling (and dealing with food poisoning), the Jazz have needed to turn to other players to hang with the Clippers. Fortunately for them, a pair of not-so-average Joes have been up to the task.

Ingles has thrived in every area, whether he’s knocking down triples, guarding Chris Paul in isolation or thriving as a primary facilitator. And much to the surprise of those who have followed him throughout his career, Joe Johnson has managed to balance his high-scoring efforts with work as a distributor.

The latter Johnson has even done enough to earn a spot on Michael Shapiro’s All-Microwave Team for Sports Illustrated: “Twenty-two of Utah’s 28 fourth–quarter points came via an assist or made basket from the 16-year vet, as the Jazz went on to tie the series at two games apiece with a 105-98 victory. At 35, Johnson’s minutes may have waned, but his ability to get buckets in crunch time hasn’t slowed down at all.”

Hayward and Gobert should eventually reassert themselves as the team’s primary standouts, but the Johnsons have allowed Utah to stay in the series.
6. Steven Adams and Russell Westbrook, Oklahoma City Thunder
6 OF 11

J Pat Carter/Getty Images
Minutes: 109

Net Rating: 9.2 (No. 61)

Total TPA: 34.09 (No. 28)

Russell Westbrook has been a one-man show for the Oklahoma City Thunder. Try to contain your surprise.

When he’s on the floor, OKC has more than hung with the Houston Rockets, outscoring them by 2.1 points per 100 possessions. But when he sits, everything falls apart for the Thunder, who are then outscored by a whopping 40.3 points over the same average stretch. To avoid any anger from the point guard himself, it’s worth noting that we’re not trying to split up the team, so much as state facts.

This gets more difficult when we have to pair Westbrook with someone, since no other member of the Thunder has consistently stood out in positive fashion. Victor Oladipo is a natural candidate, but he’s struggled to find his shot against Houston’s ever-improving defense. In fact, Andre Roberson is the only other man who joins Westbrook with a positive score in NBA Math’s TPA, though he’s done so with defense rather than offense.

So, why isn’t the leading one-two punch comprised of Westbrook and Roberson? Well, the latter is often matched up against James Harden, which means he’s forced to face a tougher opposing squad than many of the other Thunder rotation members. He and Westbrook have posted a 1.8 net rating together—respectable, but nowhere close to the 9.2 net rating the point guard and Steven Adams have earned.

There’s plenty of overlap between these three players, but Roberson is disadvantaged by playing more minutes and coming back to earth in those less-than-ideal situations.

Follow your favorite teams and leagues in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.

5. Jimmy Butler and Rajon Rondo, Chicago Bulls
7 OF 11

Dylan Buell/Getty Images
Minutes: 63

Net Rating: 20.3 (No. 21)

Total TPA: 22.69 (No. 57)

Before an injured thumb knocked Rajon Rondo out of the lineup, the Chicago Bulls were forcing the Boston Celtics to sweat profusely. They made the C’s look like one of the least impressive No. 1 seeds in NBA history by winning each of the first two games in convincing fashion.

And it’s no coincidence the Celtics rebounded after Rondo went down.

Despite his forgettable 2016-17 campaign and the last few regression-filled years, the talented point guard became a legitimate star during Games 1 and 2. He averaged 11.5 points, 8.5 rebounds and 10.0 assists while shooting 42.3 percent from the field, and his hounding defense against Isaiah Thomas was even more important than any of his offensive contributions.

Even as Jimmy Butler struggled to find his shot, he and Rondo were an unstoppable tandem, outscoring the Celtics by an eye-popping 20.3 points per 100 possessions. Among the seven other two-man lineups that have recorded more than 60 minutes for Chicago in the first-round series, only three join the Butler-Rondo tandem in the green:

Lineup Offensive Rating Defensive Rating Net Rating
Jimmy Butler and Rajon Rondo 115.8 95.5 20.3
Jimmy Butler and Dwyane Wade 105.9 102.7 3.2
Robin Lopez and Dwyane Wade 108.2 106.5 1.7
Nikola Mirotic and Dwyane Wade 108.3 106.7 1.6
Butler and Rondo didn’t just thrive on one end. They played ultra-efficient offense while posting a defensive rating topped by only 13 of the 189 two-man lineups that have logged more than 60 minutes in the 2017 postseason.
4. Jamal Crawford and Chris Paul, Los Angeles Clippers
8 OF 11

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
Minutes: 64

Net Rating: 14.2 (No. 39)

Total TPA: 38.16 (No. 16)

Chris Paul is a wizard.

No, he didn’t suddenly get traded to the Washington Wizards. He’s just incredible at the whole basketball thing, often carrying the Los Angeles Clippers as they deal with injuries to key players (Blake Griffin and Austin Rivers) and ineffectiveness from too many rotation members. Through four games, he’s averaging 26.8 points, 6.3 rebounds, 10.8 assists and 2.3 steals while almost singlehandedly keeping them afloat against an inspired Utah Jazz squad.

If that’s not enough, Paul is putting up those monstrous per-game numbers while maintaining sterling levels of efficiency. He’s shooting 53.2 percent from the field, 36.8 percent percent from deep and 90.0 percent at the stripe, turning the ball over just 2.5 times per contest and pacing the field in NBA Math’s TPA.

But Paul needs a partner in crime, and that’s been tougher to come by.

Griffin was struggling on offense before a toe injury knocked him out of the postseason. Ditto for DeAndre Jordan, except for the part about an injury. Even J.J. Redick has failed to gain footing against Utah’s stifling defense.

That leaves Jamal Crawford, who has had issues with his own shot but still drawn enough defensive attention to open lanes for his backcourt teammate. The Clippers are scoring a staggering 125.9 points per 100 possessions when both guards are playing, leaving them trailing only three duos among all 189 qualified entrants: George Hill/Joe Johnson (128.8), Hill/Rodney Hood (127.4) and Crawford/Jordan (127.2).

But unlike the other three groupings, Paul and Crawford have actually played defense as well—thanks more to the former than the latter, of course.
3. Kawhi Leonard and Patty Mills, San Antonio Spurs
9 OF 11

Rocky Widner/Getty Images
Minutes: 71

Net Rating: 25.7 (No. 8)

Total TPA: 37.93 (No. 18)

If the first round of the NBA playoffs rewarded the biggest standout with an MVP award, it might be Kawhi Leonard’s to lose. Even while the majority of his teammates have struggled against the Memphis Grizzlies, he’s kept the San Antonio Spurs in the hunt with his fantastic two-way play. The unabashed superstar can’t miss down the stretch, and it’s not like he’s misfiring too frequently early in the proceedings.

Leonard has spent more than 60 minutes on the floor with five different teammates, and he’s outscoring the Grizz in each and every pairing:

Lineup Offensive Rating Defensive Rating Net Rating
Kawhi Leonard and Patty Mills 125.2 99.5 25.7
Kawhi Leonard and Pau Gasol 125.5 103.4 22.1
Kawhi Leonard and LaMarcus Aldridge 109.4 100.9 8.5
Kawhi Leonard and Tony Parker 110.3 103.3 7.0
Kawhi Leonard and Danny Green 107.2 104.4 2.8
In fact, removing the minutes restriction reveals Leonard has shared the court with 11 different teammates in the first round. Only when he plays with Dewayne Dedmon does Memphis have an edge.

None, however, have experienced more success than Patty Mills, who can capably spread the court for Leonard’s dizzying assault from all angles.
2. James Harden and Nene, Houston Rockets
10 OF 11

Nathaniel S. Butler/Getty Images
Minutes: 77

Net Rating: 25.1 (No. 11)

Total TPA: 40.06 (No. 14)

Believe it or not, this has been a legitimate one-two punch during the playoffs.

Nene Hilario has been fantastic for the Houston Rockets, highlighting an effective opening round with 28 points and 10 rebounds in Game 4 while shooting a flawless 12-of-12 from the field. His ability to dive to the rim and finish plays around the hoop has given the Oklahoma City Thunder fits, especially when he’s able to operate without Russell Westbrook pushing the pace.

James Harden and Hilario were an effective duo during the regular season, outscoring opponents by 7.1 points per 100 possessions. For perspective, the Rockets’ overall net rating was 5.4, and they topped foes by 6.3 points per 100 possessions with the bearded guard on the floor.

But playing with Hilario has been more than a marginal upgrade through four games that truly count.

Houston has flat-out trounced the Thunder with the two working together in the pick-and-roll, and it doesn’t hurt that the big man has been able to pick up some of the defensive slack. With Clint Capela failing to assert himself offensively, Nene has seized the opportunity and doesn’t look ready to slow down quite yet.

Chances are good that Eric Gordon, Lou Williams, Patrick Beverley or Trevor Ariza will replace Hilario alongside Harden by the time Houston’s postseason run comes to a conclusion. But for now, it’s nice to see the numbers rewarding him for his efforts.
1. Stephen Curry and Draymond Green, Golden State Warriors
11 OF 11

Noah Graham/Getty Images
Minutes: 102

Net Rating: 27.5 (No. 6)

Total TPA: 71.29 (No. 1)

The gap between this duo and the rest of the featured tandems is gigantic. Only alternate pairings on the Golden State Warriors roster have been able to compete with Stephen Curry and Draymond Green, who helped spark a first-round sweep of the Portland Trail Blazers even while Kevin Durant missed time due to injury.

Not one combination of teammates has produced a higher combined score in NBA Math’s TPA; Andre Roberson and Russell Westbrook (47.74) came closest, but they weren’t even in the same ballpark. Of course, that makes sense when Green and Curry sit at Nos. 3 and 6, respectively, in the league-wide standings.

On the flip side, a whopping five pairings have produced higher net ratings. Problem is, they’ve—with one notable exception—done so in far fewer minutes:

Lineup Net Rating Minutes Played
Stephen Curry and JaVale McGee 41.8 48
Stephen Curry and Zaza Pachulia 37.8 48
Zaza Pachulia and Klay Thompson 37.8 48
Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson 31.1 100
Ryan Anderson and Lou Williams 28.2 52
Stephen Curry and Draymond Green 27.5 102
Hello, Warriors. Nice of you all to show up.

Only Curry/Thompson and Curry/Green are eligible here, given the minutes restrictions, and Green has been far superior to the starting 2-guard as an individual. But if you’re upset about the chosen lineup for the Western Conference favorites, take solace in the fact that any combination of Curry, Thompson and Green would fall within the top five of these rankings.

Get the best game highlights and scores experience in the new B/R app. Get the app and get the game.
Adam Fromal covers the NBA for Bleacher Report. Follow him on Twitter: @fromal09. Unless otherwise indicated, all stats from Basketball Reference,, or NBA Math and accurate heading into the playoffs.     


FILE – In this Nov. 19, 2016, file photo, North Carolina quarterback Mitch Trubisky (10) looks to pass against The …more

Gerry Broome, AP




Only the Cleveland Browns.

Myles Garrett is without doubt the best player in the 2017 NFL Draft class. There isn’t another prospect in the draft close to him. He should be an automatic selection as the No. 1 pick.

Enter Browns owner Jimmy Haslam.

The Browns coaching staff is all set to take Garrett. Head coach Hue Jackson is said to be enamored with him.

But the NFL is a quarterback’s league and the Browns are currently rolling with Brock Osweiler and Cody Kessler as their top two signal-callers.

There is nothing scarier than to see a desperate owner, general manager or draft-day war-room manager grasping at straws.

For weeks, the Browns have been rumored to have legit interest in North Carolina quarterback Mitchell Trubisky. It was disregarded as an unneeded smoke screen. It’s the Browns seeing if another quarterback desperate team might offer them a nice trade package for the No. 1 overall pick.

Lest we forget, these are the Browns. A franchise that has been the laughing stock of the NFL. A team that has two winning seasons since it was reborn in 1999.

Haslam and the front office are on the verge of ignoring their coaching staff and scouts and selecting Trubisky instead.

Now this wouldn’t be so shocking for most QB-needy teams in the NFL. It wouldn’t be a big deal in typical draft classes with elite QB prospects, either.

That’s the stunning part about this whole process. Trubisky, or DeShaun Watson for that matter, are not elite QB prospects.

There’s one theory involving the draft that says, “It’s not a bad pick unless you take a player who might still be available when you pick again.”

That works against the Browns, too.

The Browns have another first-round pick at No. 12 overall. Plus, they have two second-round picks they can use as ammunition in a trade, allowing them to move back into the top five or 10 picks and take Trubisky.

Maybe the 49ers or Bears, have convinced Cleveland they’re going to take Trubisky with the second or third pick. The Browns might not be willing to call this bluff.

If the Browns actually take Trubisky, a quarterback who started just 13 games in college, at No. 1 overall, it will be one of the most confounding selections in recent memory.

And it would embody the train wreck that is the Cleveland Browns.

1. Cleveland Browns select Myles Garrett, Edge, Texas A&M

This should be a no-brainer, so I’m going to keep Garrett as the No. 1 pick until the Browns prove that they can screw this up on an epic level. Garrett is clearly the top prospect in the draft. He came out of Arlington Martin High School highly touted as the No. 1 prospect and lived up to that rating at Texas A&M. He finished seventh all-time for career sacks in the SEC with 32.5. Cleveland would be crazy to take anyone else. Then again, Cleveland is pretty crazy.

2. San Francisco 49ers select Jamal Adams, S, LSU

FILE – This Dec. 31, 2016, file photo shows Louisville wide receiver James Quick (17) being stopped …more

John Raoux, AP

I’ll admit it. I have no clue what the 49ers are going to do. I have some idea of what most teams will do in the first round, but the 49ers baffle me and that’s odd to say about the team selecting No. 2. Most industry mocks have had Stanford DE Solomon Thomas going here. The Niners haven’t shown much interest in him, though, so it’s hard to make sense of that pick. Adams is an elite athlete. This would be the highest a safety was selected since 2001.

3. Chicago Bears select Solomon Thomas, Edge, Stanford

This is a great scenario for the Bears. They’re very high on Thomas and it didn’t always look they would have the option of taking him. This pick shouldn’t take long to get to the podium unless the Bears explore trading options.

4. Jacksonville Jaguars select Leonard Fournette, RB, LSU

No player has provided more highlight reel material than Fournette in the past three years. A man of his size shouldn’t be so nimble and he’ll flatten DBs when given the chance. He’s a wild card in the early portion of the draft, projecting from as high as No. 2 overall to No. 15. He should go closer to two than 15.

5. Cleveland Browns (from Tennessee) select Mitchell Trubisky, QB, North Carolina

This is a projected trade between Cleveland and Tennessee. The Browns are apparently considering Trubisky with the No. 1 pick. That would be one of the most confounding decisions in draft history, but an appropriate one made by the NFL’s most inept franchise. If they don’t take a QB at No. 1 expect the Browns to trade into the top 10 for Trubisky. And they might think they need to trade in front of the Jets to land him.

6. New York Jets select Marshon Lattimore, CB, Ohio State

The Jets have put a lot of value on having top-end CBs in the past. Lattimore is the best cover man in this class. They have added Morris Claiborne, but his injury history is lucrative. Plus Lattimore could be better than any other option they have across from Claiborne.

7. Los Angeles Chargers select Malik Hooker, S, Ohio State

Hooker could end up going as high as No. 3 overall. Several teams prefer him to Jamal Adams. Comparisons to Earl Thomas are the norm. There are some rumblings the Chargers could opt for Stanford RB Christian McCaffrey.

8. Carolina Panthers select Christian McCaffrey, RB, Stanford

FILE- In this Oct. 29, 2016, file photo, Stanford running back Christian McCaffrey (5) stiff-arms …more

Rick Scuteri, AP

This development is only a couple weeks old. The Panthers started focusing heavily on the top RBs in the draft, and it’s not out of question they try to trade up a few spots to land Fournette. McCaffrey is their consolation prize. The do-it-all back could take some of the offensive focus off Cam Newton.

9. Cincinnati Bengals select Jonathan Allen, DT, Alabama

The Bengals hope two teams either trade up or reach for a quarterback in front of them. They have the luxury of sitting back and letting a very good player fall into their laps. In this scenario, it’s a guy once projected to go No. 2 overall. The Bengals ranked 31st against the run last season. Allen improves that number just by lining up.

10. Buffalo Bills select O.J. Howard, TE, Alabama

The Bills have been linked to DeShaun Watson, but some sources say they will no select a quarterback at No. 10 overall. Howard makes the most sense so far. He wasn’t utilized enough at Alabama — a fact Nick Saban has admitted — Howard is a special TE prospect…..

I agree 100%